Sunday, February 09, 2020

New blog and links

Welcome to the Raptor Resource Project's original blog site! Our new blogs are located at, but all of the old blogs are archived here. Thanks for reading and watching with us!

Monday, November 26, 2018

2018 by the Numbers! #GivingTuesday #Budget

To help kick-off Giving Tuesday on Tuesday, November 27, we wanted to talk about what we did this year. Here are the things that your donations got done. Please donate to the Raptor Resource Project to help us continue our work in 2019 and beyond!

New Projects
In 2018, we expanded our educational partnerships with Neil Rettig Productions and the Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, partnered with the Upper Mississippi National Wildlife and Fish Refuge and the Brice Prairie Conservation Association on a new Mississippi River Flyway Cam, and built a starter nest after the Decorah North Eagle nest collapsed. We:
  • Began a kestrel cam in collaboration with Neil Rettig Productions and the Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology. The cam gave us an intimate look at the lives of nesting kestrels, including hatch, eyass behavior, prey and prey transfers, parental care, and so much more! You can see highlights from this year's nest on our Facebook page at  During the nesting season, it can be watched here:
  • Partnered with the Upper Mississippi National Wildlife and Fish Refuge and the Brice Prairie Conservation Association on a new Mississippi River Flyway Cam. This camera is located on an island in the middle of Lake Onalaska in the Mississippi River and has given watchers an unparalleled look at resident and migrating birds, including Bald Eagles, Sandhill Cranes, Tundra Swans, American White Pelicans, and many other species of birds. That cam can be watched here and here. Speaking personally? I can't tear myself away! I don't know what it will look like in the winter, but it has been simply amazing this fall!
  • Built a new starter nest for the Decorah North Eagles after their nest collapsed during a torrential rainstorm in August. The eagles appear to have adopted it and are putting their signature touches on in the form of branches, corn husks and grasses.  
Online Interaction and Education
We also kept busy with our online interaction and education program! Since January 1, 2018, we have:
  • Provided over 1,785 hours of chat on the Decorah eagles channel, including 449 hours of dedicated educational chat. Our Decorah North group provided 576 hours of moderated chat. 
  • Posted 406 times on Facebook. Topics and photos included the Decorah Eagles, the Decorah North Eagles, the GSB Peregrine Falcons, the Fort St. Vrain Eagles, tracking D27, Robin Brumm's trips to Decorah, Peregrine Falcon banding, nest box work, and many other topics related to our nests and birds. Posts were shared from Neil Rettig Productions, SOAR, the Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, Jim Brandenberg's 365 Nature project, and several fan pages. 
  • Written 11 blogs and 43 articles on our web site. We reported on and addressed questions about the eagles, the nests, nest intruders, eaglet growth and development, Dad's disappearance, the arrival of new males, eagle ID, prey remains in the nest, and the events at the Decorah North Nest. 
  • Completed our move to and moved chat to our website. Our partnership with Explore has allowed us to increase stream quality, drop advertising, and serve content to an ever-growing array of devices, phones, tablets, phablets, and computers. The Decorah Eagles, Decorah North Eagles, Great Spirit Bluff falcons, and Mississippi Flyway Cam can be watched at Explore or on our website at We're also developing a Field Guide and some reporting tools so you can learn about and report on all of the birds and goings-on around our nests! 
  • We're looking at ways to grow our educational outreach in 2019, including offering more downloadable curriculum, educational videos, and reporting tools.
I need to give a shout out to our amazing volunteer moderators. Let me be very clear - our volunteers make our pages the best on the web and we could not provide our chat or online educational program without their help! They have educated people, comforted people, and welcomed them into a wider circle of eagle friends. We thank them for everything they do!

Monitoring, Banding, and Recovery
Our peregrine falcon program is key part of who we are and what we do! In 2018, we:
  • Monitored over 50 peregrine falcon and bald eagle nest sites and potential territories in Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa, Illinois, and Colorado.
  • Banded 72 falcons at 38 sites in Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa, and Illinois between May 24 and July 11th! Our northernmost territory was in Cohasset, Minnesota and our southernmost territory was in Peoria, Illinois. As always, we reported all banding and follow up data to the Bird Banding Lab and the Midwest Peregrine Society. Our northernmost site on the Saint Croix River (Arcola Mills) came online this year, and we're hoping the Root River site is productive next year. Both of these sites are historical eyries that have been empty since the mid-1950s.
  • Followed D27! She spent the summer in Ontario before returning home to the Decorah area in September. 
Thanks to our utility, industrial, and landowner partners for all of their help and support! A huge thanks to Brett Mandernack for including 'our' eagles in his studies and for sharing all of the data about their whereabouts and fates. Thanks also to David and Ann Lynch and Brian Malaise for their help with the transmitter project. We couldn't do it without all of you!

Camera Research and Installation
John Howe, Kike (Enrique or Kee-Kay) Arnal, Amy Ries, David Kester, Richard Meredith, John Dingley, Neil Rettig, and Laura Johnson installed a total of six cameras and six microphones at N1, N2B, Decorah North, Lake Onalaska (the Flyway cam), and two kestrel nestboxes near Prairie Du Chien, WI and at Xcel Energy's Pawnee facility in Brush, CO. We upgraded to 4K cameras at N1, N2B, and Decorah North, installed a 4K camera in Lake Onalaska, and cleaned the cameras and collected prey remains at the Fort St. Vrain eagle nest.  We did our three eagle cam sites between August 20 and September 29th, when the eagles are at their loosest point of attachment to their nests. It was a busy season but the upgrades in video and sound were well worth it, and we can't stop watching the new Mississippi Flyway cam! The installations took roughly 1050 hours total. Thanks to the US Fish and Wildlife Service and the Brice Prairie Conservation Association for their help with the Flyway Cam!

Watchers might remember that we installed a new nest box at Great Spirit Bluff last year. This year, two falcons hatched and, thanks to the fan John installed, we had no problems with blackfly-related mortality or jumping! While this design can't be used everywhere, we were very pleased with its performance in our first year and will look at adopting the open-back design and possibly a fan in more nest boxes. John Howe put in hundreds of hours researching, ordering, and testing cameras this year. While the majority of our installs are done in September and October, camera and streaming research take place year-round.

Other Stuff
  • We threw our annual After The Fledge party between July 19 and July 21. Over 100 eagle fans and volunteers had a blast celebrating the Decorah eagles and Decorah itself! Despite the challenging weather, attendees enjoyed a bike ride, kayaking, a Meet and Greet at the Winneshiek Hotel, a talk at Luther, a dinner at the Hatchery, and a great boat ride on Sunday, with excellent entertainment from Big Blue Sky
  • We upgraded our website and our live streams to give users a safer, easier, and faster way to watch our eagles and falcons on a variety of platforms, including mobile devices and tablets! We committed to moved our chat to our website, added chat at Decorah North, and are currently looking at ways to make our website even more friendly to phones, tablets, phablets, and devices. 
  • We added new remote volunteer camera operators to increase our coverage. This has given us new insights into the lives and habitat of the birds we watch!  
Our Budget
In 2018, our annual expenses are hovering around $271,600 per year. They break down like this:
  • Staff and contractor compensation will cost an estimated $146,700 this year. We pay for a director, two busy regular contractors (Amy and Dave), an extremely important climber and camera installer (Mr. Arnal), two master banders, and additional people as needed. We are committed to paying a fair wage for work, which means that everyone we contract with is compensated at a living wage or better. 
  • Camera equipment and IT expenses – cameras, microphones, cables, encoders, software, licensing fees, website costs, and so on – will come in at around $42,100. HD and 4K cameras are amazing, brilliant, and breathtaking…but they don’t come cheap. Software licensing and IT expenses continue to rise as we bring more camera operators on and do everything we can to make sure our website and streams are watchable on a variety of devices, secure, encrypted, and always up. Watchers will remember that our website was attacked in April of this year. We dealt with it, but dealing with it and preventing further attacks costs money!
  • Office and field supplies – paper, printer expenses, new ropes, slings, rappelling tools, hardware, zip ties, screws, silicon gel, rope bags, harnesses, lumber, paint, tape, bands, banding equipment, and trapping equipment – will cost about $7,500. Given all the trips we made to the hardware store this year, I think it’s a pretty good deal (I said this last year, but it is still true)! Several of us also pay for our own climbing equipment instead of having RRP do it, which helps keep expenses lower and gives Amy a great excuse to go shopping. Although she discovered a rope in safe storage this fall that should keep rope expenses down in the year to come.
  • Office and land rental fees cost $7,500.
  • We can’t work or drive the company vehicle without insurance! Although it isn’t nearly as exciting a topic as eagles or falcons, John did an excellent job negotiating insurance, which will cost us $1,300 this year. This was a decrease from last year, and we have better coverage, too! Other things I would put in the necessary-but-ho-hum category include vehicle expenses ($4,500), fundraising fees and gifts ($6,000), accounting ($4,000), postage and delivery ($5000 – and that’s with the non-profit rate!), and our endowment funding ($20,000 and please consider donating to the Bob Anderson Memorial Scholarship fund). 
  • Travel and meetings cost us $8,000. While this might sound expensive, Amy alone put over 30,000 RRP-related miles on last year. This number would be much higher if Amy and John didn’t donate a significant amount of their travel. Although we don’t usually go too far from home, we put a lot of miles on during banding and camera season! Was it higher than we projected last year? It was, and might be again!
  • Printing and copying isn’t cheap! We’re projecting a total of $12,000 for this year. That includes a large newsletter printings, all of our thank you letters and envelopes, and any printing related to talks, events, and presentations.
  • Speaking of events, After the Fledge will cost about $1,500 this year. You should come next year – it is a great celebration of our eagles!
  • And finally, grants to partner organizations will total $10,000.
Our income is generated by a combination of donations from viewers, grants from corporate partners, and a grant from the Iowa DNR’s Conservation Education program that supported our Hawk Hill Banding Station in 2017 and 2018. But donations from viewers like you remain our biggest single source of income. We sincerely appreciate your generosity and support of the Raptor Resource Project mission. Would you please help us make a difference with your donation? Thank you so much for your support and we hope you enjoy watching in 2019!

Wednesday, November 21, 2018

A Reflection and A Thanksgiving

November 23rd would have been Bob Anderson's birthday. I assume that our friend and founder would finally have achieved his dream of retirement - or at least semi-retirement - and be busy with his book by now. Given the thankful nature of the season, it seems like a good time to take stock of where the Raptor Resource Project has been, where it plans on going, and what I have to be thankful for.

For those of you who don't know, Bob founded the Raptor Resource Project to propagate and release peregrine falcons. He was the first person to successfully breed peregrine falcons in Minnesota. MF-1, one of the first falcons he produced and released, became the first returned falcon to breed in the mid-continent following the species' extirpation in the mid-1960's. It took an incredible amount of work to keep the peregrine falcon from joining the long list of species that will be mourned on the remembrance day for lost speciesI am thankful that the peregrine falcon is still with us. Where we have a will, we have a way.
Falcon MF-1. Produced by Bob, she was the first falcon to return and breed in the wild mid-continent. 
I am thankful to have met Bob. He responded to an ad my little writing business was running back in 1994. I began by writing grants, but very quickly moved into field work. Did I want to attend a banding and take pictures? Yes! Did I want to hold falcons? Yes! Did I want to rappel? Yes yes yes! The writer William Least Heat Moon said in the Wonsevu chapter of the book PrairyErth that "I'm not sure what to make of it, but I think a dream can set you on another path.Bob's dream of restoring the peregrine falcon set many people's lives on another path.

Most of the power plant people originally involved in our utility-peregrine program have retired, but a new generation of men and women have replaced them in this unique marriage of industry and conservation. The peregrine would not be where it is today without their help and whole-hearted involvement in the program. Together we've put up nest boxes and internet cameras, cared for falcons, eagles, and kestrels, and looked at ways to make generation and distribution safer for our birds. I am thankful to have worked with the fine men and women employed at America's power plants. The utility-peregrine program is an example of the ways in which humans can support wildlife even in the unlikeliest of areas. You guys are awesome...and great fun, too!
Banding at Xcel's Allen S. King plant in 2010
Bob was also working on his cliff release project. Back in 1994, he began to believe that nest-site imprinting was preventing the crossover of peregrines from power plants to cliffs. The Iowa DNR was very interested in working with Bob, so he picked up lock, stock, and barrel to move down to Bluffton, Iowa in 1996. He did a successful pilot release on the Upper Iowa river in 1997 and released a total of 19 falcons from Hanging Rock at Effigy Mounds National Monument in 1998 and 1999. The Upper Iowa hackbox can still be seen from the river, although the Effigy Mounds hackboxes are long gone. In 2000, our cliff-released falcons became the first falcons to return to the cliffs of the Mississippi. I remember going to see them quite well, since I was very pregnant with my last son. I did a lot of crazy things for and with Bob, but the only time I remember him being really worried about me was just after I huffed and puffed my way up the back of Queen's Bluff. Pat Schlarbaum's story about peregrine recovery includes information about our cliff releases. It can be read here: am thankful to have played a small piece in this story, and very grateful to the men and women of the Iowa DNR who supported Bob's work.
Falcons raised for cliff release, 1997
In 2006 and 2007, Bob was working with Neil Rettig on the movie American Bald Eagle. After the two wrapped up, Bob said "Wouldn't it be fun to put this nest on the internet?" We made Bob's dream a reality in 2009, when the Decorah Eagle Cam uploaded an image to Xcel Energy's website every two minutes. In 2010, Luther College hosted a live feed. In 2011, we moved to Ustream and the Decorah eagles became a worldwide sensation. While we celebrated the eagles, Bob also mourned the loss of his dear friend and fellow falconer Rob MacIntyre, the 'mad scientist' who was featured so prominently in the movie RaptorForce. Rob did a lot of the work on our earlier cam systems, and his death was a real blow both personally and professionally. I am thankful to have known him and his wonderful wife Jan. They brightened every room they entered.
Rob and Bob
While Bob never lost his drive to recover birds of prey, he suddenly had a new focus. He was deeply engaged in using our bird cams to reach learners and provide a palliative window to the outside for ill, injured, and bedridden people. Online education became a major focus, but cameras still needed to be researched and purchased, and HD was increasingly looking like the next step. Enter John Howe! John began working with Bob to research cameras and camera technologies, including solar/wireless technologies (Rob installed our first solar/wireless system back in 2003) and HD. The longer Bob worked with John, the more he was impressed. Shortly before Bob's death, he let us all know that John was to follow him as Director of the Raptor Resource Project.
John and Bob
This brings us up to the present. In the three years since Bob's death, John has worked diligently to keep up with camera and streaming technology, deploy cameras, expand our online educational offerings, honor Bob's legacy, and secure funding (an organization doesn't run very long without money). He has more than proven himself as a director and a leader. I am thankful for John Howe and only wish that Bob was here to see the positive change that John has brought to the Raptor Resource Project.

So where do we go from here? We are sustained by our mission: to preserve and strengthen raptor populations, expand participation in raptor preservation, and help foster the next generation of preservationists. We follow our vision: to deepen the connection between people and the natural world, bringing benefits to both.
  • Education: We served 1,270 educators through our educational video stream and chat in 2018. We also added a kestrel live stream in partnership with Neil Rettig Productions and Cornell University and completed the second fall of our research and educational banding station in partnership with Luther College. Teachers Deb Ripple and Lori Carnes have started to produce curriculum for our educational program and teachers are also sharing ideas on a platform started by Lori. 
  • Preserving and Strengthening Raptor Populations: Despite the rain and lower hatching success this year, we banded 72 falcons in 2018. We will continue to monitor our nests, band falcons, consult on nestboxes and habitat for a variety of species, provide input on conservation issues, and work with federal and state wildlife agencies to benefit of birds of prey. We are also looking at ways to strengthen existing partnerships and build new ones. How can we connect our passionate followers with organizations looking for volunteers? How can we work closer with our utility and industry partners on providing or improving habitat for the many birds that nest on or use utility land and water in other ways? How can we advocate for birds of prey? We have done a lot, but we can do more. We stand on the shoulders of giants!
  • Fostering the Next Generation of Preservationists: We've begun an educational endowment in Bob's honor. Please follow this link to learn more and to donate! We hope to fund our first students next fall.
  • Connecting People with the Natural World: John upped the ante on our cameras! We are currently providing top-notch, HD, ads-free streams through Explore, and streams plus live chat at our website. John's current camera installations are also letting us take a look at life outside our nests - an important part of understanding and caring for the eagles and falcons we watch. A challenge for me: how do we develop quantifiable data from the thousands of hours of footage and anecdotes we've collected? Our knowledge has already changed since we first began watching the eagles (remember eagles are always monogamous?), but there is so much more to learn! 
So what else am I thankful for?
  • I am thankful for our amazing volunteers. In addition to your incredible work, my life is better for having known you. I've said it before and I'll say it again...your work makes us the best site on the web!
  • I am thankful for fans of the Decorah eagles and our other birds. Please, keep emailing and mailing your stories and art. You have deepened our lives an immeasurable amount.
  • I am thankful to our Board for providing direction and guidance. 
  • I am thankful for an unexpected and unlooked for gift: the honor to be part of the Raptor Resource Project's work. My 1994 self - I was 28 years old! - had no way of knowing what saying 'Yes' to Bob's first request would lead to. Bob, we will remember and celebrate you until we join you.
Thank you, everyone. I'm going to close with a link to a favorite blog I did on Bob back in 2012: Watching Bald Eagles. In re-reading it, I affirmed my own goal to help our eagles' futures stretch as long as their past. May Mom and Dad's progeny survive into a beautiful future, and may falcon MF-1 have thousands more descendants! Long may they all fly!

The Raptor Resource Project wishes you and yours a very Happy Thanksgiving!

Wednesday, October 17, 2018

Who's on N2B? Welcome to the Confusion Couch!

Welcome to the Confusion Couch! Many of our followers are asking "Who is that eagle?" after watching the Decorah and Decorah North nests this week. In Decorah, an adult male eagle that we've been calling DM isn't DM (or Dad - sorry, everyone!). And we can't decide who we're seeing ar Decorah North. Is that Mr. and Mrs. North, or are we seeing somebody else?

Let's start with Decorah. We originally thought that DM came to N2B a couple of days ago, but started to rethink it after taking a closer look. We needed iris patterns and John was able to get some yesterday. We're going to start with head studies...

Decorah Male, FKA UME, June 2018. DM lost feathers during a blackfly strike, which left him pretty tattered looking. He presumably would have grown them in since then.
DM? October 16, 2018. While DM would have regrown feathers lost in the black fly attack, this head study gave us pause. It sure didn't look like DM!
Dad Decorah, February 2018. Rumors quickly began to fly that the October 16 eagle was Dad returning to N2B.

The three head studies offered a tantalizing hint that our October 16th eagle was not DM, but more was needed to prove it. Fortunately, irises are very helpful in ID’ing individual eagles. Like fingerprints, each iris is unique.

DM? Male eagle from October 16, 2018
DM, June 2018
Dad Decorah, February 2018

We are looking at the left side of the eagle’s face in every photo, so we’re comparing left iris to left iris. The irises of all three eagles have distinctly different patterns and markings. The eagle we thought was DM, who we will refer to as UME-2 from now on, has an iris with some patterning around the center and a distinct small blotch at around 3:00. Like UME-2, DM’s eye has some central patterning, but he has two eye spots instead of one, and his eye spots are located at about 5:30 and 7:00. Dad’s eye has less central patterning and more eye spots than either UME-2 or DM. I checked earlier iris surveys and found that Dad’s iris splotches and dots didn’t change much over the years we watched him, which rules out a return. UME-2’s irises are simply too different for him to be Dad.

So why did we think this eagle was DM at first? First and foremost, that’s who we expected to see. DM has been identified recently and has been on territory pretty consistently since he showed up in April. Mom’s response didn’t give us any reason to question the eagle’s identity – a prey chase is often game on and Mom has chased DM around! – and he seemed quite comfortable at the Y and on N2B. We’re reminding ourselves to look closer before ID’ing eagles, especially in a rapidly changing situation like this. Bald eagle mate changeovers are a new thing for us and we’re learning a lot about what that can look like. We’re also wondering if this eagle hasn’t been here a little longer than we thought. Has Mom been perching with UME or DM or some other eagle in the maple tree? At this point, we don’t know.

How about Decorah North? We’re in an active discussion about Mr. and Mrs. North as I write this. We aren’t seeing white pantaloon streaks on the female eagle that is visiting the nest now, but the head and facial features are very similar. Are the white pantaloon feathers really a good marker? I checked in with our eagle panel, who felt that they were pretty reliable given that Mrs. North has had them for the three years we’ve watched her. But no one could say for sure. Both eagles have been seen pretty consistently and they are spending time in familiar spots. However, those spots might be desirable to any eagle, so that’s not really an indicator either. I’ve put myself on the Confusion Couch here, but we will be trying to get some good close-ups for iris and leg scale comparison.

So what’s going to happen next? Is Mom going to bond with a new male this year? Will it be DM or has another male pushed him out? How long will it be until we know? Unfortunately, we have no idea. Until last April, it seemed like Mom and Dad would be together forever. As of this fall, it seemed like Mom and DM might enter into a pair bond. And now we’re throwing our hands up into the air, getting back to eagle time, and waiting for Mom to show us what she’s going to do. Eagles are moving around right now, which means that Mom may have plenty of suitors to choose from and UME-2 may not be the last new male we see at N2B this year. We’ll continue to get eye patterns when we can at both of our nests, we’ll do our best to count the visitors, and we’re looking forward to learning more about this stage of eagle life. Go eagles – and the best of luck to both nests this year.

The takeaway? We don’t always know as much as we think we know and ID takes time and skill…especially in a situation like this. We need to make sure we don’t let our personal stories and ideas about the eagles interfere with our eagle observations – not an easy task when we spend so much time watching and thinking about them! Behavior can help guide observations, but may not be especially helpful given that good perching and nesting spots might appeal to multiple eagles.

A Guide to the Acronyms

  • DM stands for Decorah Male. Formerly known as UME (Unknown Male Eagle), he showed up in mid-April, right after Dad disappeared. 
  • UME-2 stands for Unknown Male Eagle 2. UME-2 has been on site since at least October 15. While we don’t give every eagle we see an ID, UME-2 has been in N2B, perched near N1, and been pursued by Mom. He’s been on site long enough to get an ID. 
  • N2B: N2B stands for Nest Two-Bob. N2, or Nest 2, went down in a storm in 2015. Bob approved the starter nest plan but died before it could be completed. We named the nest in his honor. 
  • N1: N1 is the second nest on this territory. It was over in a tree across Siewers Spring Road, but has mostly disintegrated since the eagles left it in 2012.

Tuesday, August 14, 2018

What's on the menu at the Decorah North Nest?

Kike collected prey remains from the Decorah North nest when we were working on cameras in the fall of 2017. Since my family was tired of animal parts in the garage and 2018's fall camera work is just around the corner, I decided it was time to get them identified!

The photo below shows all of the remains that Kike recovered from the nest. In all, he found 23 white-tailed deer remains (4 partial skulls, 18 leg bones, including four with the hooves still hatched, and one sacrum that measured 3-7/8" wide by 7.5" long), three wild turkey remains (legs with the claws still attached), one opossum skull, one raccoon skull, an unknown set of wings, a dry corncob, 4 unknown vertebrae, 1 unknown skull fragment, and some unknown mammalian leg bones. We also found some miscellaneous clods of fur that looked like white-tailed deer fur given the color, texture, and size of the fur piles. These were not included in our count.

I was really surprised that we didn't find more fish remains! Sherri Elliott provided this list of menu items from the 2017 North Nest season:

Feathered (19)
  • Birds (6)
  • Chicken and parts (4)
  • Coot (2)
  • Duck (1)
  • Gosling (2)
  • Grouse or Pheasant (3)
  • Turkey or Goose (1)
Finned (246)

  • Trout (144)
  • Sucker (44)
  • Fish pieces (58)
Furred (47)
  • Deer – Heads (4) 
  • Legs or sections (12) 
  • Groundhog or Muskrat (2)
  • Oppossum (2)
  • Rabbit (8)
  • Raccoon and pieces (11)
  • Squirrel (6)
  • Field Mice or Voles (4)
Reptiles (2)

  • Turtles (2)

Miscellaneous (125)
  • Cow Placenta (37)
  • Mystery Meat or Unidentified Food Objects (48)
  • Animal legs/feet (4)
  • Pink/Red Innards (24)
  • Bony Meat (12)
What we saw come into the nest was in line with our expectations about what eagles eat overall.  As we've seen in our other nests, the North Eagles have a preference for fresh fish but will happily eat other foods, especially if those foods fall into the low risk/high reward category - think cow placenta, which takes very little energy expenditure or risk to get when cows are calving near your nest tree. However, if we had been relying on nest remains to determine eagle diet, we would have had a very distorted view of their food web. The prey remains we find in a nest might not adequately reflect what the eagles are eating, especially if they are eating foods that don't leave prey remains behind (placenta, innards), decompose quickly or fall into the nest (small or previously butchered prey), or are eaten by nest visitors like mice, squirrels, and other birds.

Having said that, I was surprised by all of the white-tailed deer. We've been asked about it several times. Were the deer killed by a combine? Were the deer road-killed? Are the eagles preying on live fawn deer? What's up with all the deer?

To solve the puzzle, we have to start with the season. Mr. and Mrs. North were bringing in fawn deer between April and mid-May. Combines aren't used for discing, planting, or early cultivation, which rules out combine-killed deer. There aren't a lot of hay fields in the area and it is also too early for haying. How about road-kill? We can't rule it out entirely, but the area doesn't have many roads or much traffic, and the whole legs and sacrum were not smashed, broken, or splintered, something I would expect to see in road-killed deer. Many of the deer parts were also fairly well-developed, with small black hooves and/or bits of fur still clinging to them, which rules out aborted fetal deer.

Were Mr. and Mrs. North predating fawn deer? We used to assume that any deer brought into the nest were scavenged, but bald eagles have been observed predating fawn deer. In 2011, naturalists documented predation of a radio-collared white-tailed fawn in Menominee County, MI. In 2016, biologist Sophie Gilbert documented bald eagle predation of Sitka Black-tailed fawns. In 2017, a landowner in northeastern Wisconsin witnessed an eagle attack and kill a swimming fawn. Once the fawn was dead, the eagle dragged it to land and began feeding. In other words, it is possible that Mr. and Mrs. North were preying on fawn deer, not simply finding them dead.

The documented research on eagle/fawn deer predation tends to indicate that eagles don't commonly predate deer, so why are Mr. and Mrs. North bringing so many deer to the nest? While four or five deer (based on skull count, leg count, and observation) isn't a whole lot of deer either population or percentage-wise, it is more deer than were documented in Gilbert's study or the study done in Michigan. A few thoughts:
  • Eagles know their territories and their prey. It wouldn't take Mr. and Mrs. North long to learn that fawn deer are vulnerable to predation, especially during the first three to four weeks of life. While the Norths prefer fish over everything else, they would be happy to take an animal with a lot of reward for very little risk. 
  • There are a lot of deer in the valley of the Norths. The river, grasslands, and upland forests are surrounded by row-cropped corn and beans. This concentrates deer (and many other animals) along the river's corridor. Predated or scavenged, the presence of deer in the North's diet might be a function of the sheer numbers of deer in the valley. 
  • The Norths have an excellent territory in which to find and predate fawn deer. Their forests are relatively open, reducing the amount of cover for fawns to shelter in. Deer often cross the broad, open valley for water and forage, putting young fawns at risk once they begin traveling with their mothers. 
What did we learn? The North nest prey remains did not accurately reflect the North's overall diet, but still yielded some interesting surprises! Given the scarcity of data on eagles predating fawn deer, we'll be looking into this issue more deeply. I'm also curious about the lack of opercular bones given all the trout and suckers that were brought into the nest. We found them in the Fort St. Vrain nest. Why aren't they here?

Did you know? Bonus Skull!
Teeth are my best friend when it comes to skull identification. The skull below is upside down. Our mystery animal has some pretty unique teeth. Its combination of sharp front teeth and molars for grinding mark it as an omnivore. How many front teeth does it have past its sharp canines? It's hard to see here, but I counted ten. This marks it as an opossum! Opossums have 50 teeth total - more than any other North American land mammal!


Tuesday, August 07, 2018

Birds Threatened By Proposed Rollback Of Endangered Species Act Protections

Imagine a world where there were no bald eagles or peregrine falcons. By the late 1960's, rampant use of the pesticide DDT, habitat loss, and persecution made extinction seem very likely. The Endangered Species Act (ESA), signed into law by President Nixon in 1973, was an important part of bald eagle and peregrine falcon recovery. It:
  • Levied serious legal penalties for killing threatened and endangered species;
  • Mandated the preservation of habitat critical to a listed species' survival, and;
  • Decreed that federal agencies prevent their actions from jeopardizing the existence of threatened and endangered species. 
Despite overwhelming public support for the Act, the U.S. Department of the Interior is currently proposing to roll back endangered and threatened species protections in three critical areas. Their changes will:
  • Roll back habitat protection for endangered and threatened species; 
  • Reduce protections for and allow take of threatened species, and;
  • Weaken the role that biological assessment and science play in listing decisions.
Federal rule changes require a period of public input, which in this case ends on September 24th. If any of you would like to comment, we've put together a breakdown of the proposed changes, what each change actually means when stripped of its bureaucratic language, and links to comment. The changes break down like this...

Critical Area I: Rolling back habitat protection for endangered and threatened species
Revision of the Regulations for Listing Species and Designating Critical Habitat. This proposed rule change will make it harder to designate critical habitat: the land and waters that endangered and threatened species need to survive. It will also make it easier to eliminate existing critical habitat, opening previously protected land to commercial and recreational use.
  • What it says: "We propose to revise section 424.12(a)(1) to set forth a non-exhaustive list of circumstances in which the Services may find it is not prudent to designate critical habitat as contemplated in section 4(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Under the clarifications that we propose in this revision, the Services would have the authority but would not be required to find that designation would not be prudent in the enumerated circumstances."
  • What it means: 4(a)(3)(A) requires the Service to designate critical habitat when it makes an endangered or threatened listing; i.e., when a species is listed, its habitat must also be listed. The proposed rule change would allow the Service to exempt habitat from the listing.
  • Why it's important: For endangered species, critical habitat is the key to survival. A study by the Center for Biological Diversity found that plants and animals with federally protected habitat are more than twice as likely to be moving toward recovery than species without it. Migratory species like birds are especially vulnerable to habitat destruction because they tend to inhabit more than one natural habitat. This seemingly innocuous proposal eliminates one of the most important tools we have to protect and rebuild species in danger of going extinct. If species don't have a place to live, migrate, feed, and breed, listing means little to nothing.
What you can do: Comment on this change by pressing the blue "Comment now" button at the upper right side of this page:

The devil in the details: The federal government seeks feedback on whether it should consider modifying the definitions of “geographical area occupied by the species” or “physical or biological features” in Section 424.02. The geographical area is currently defined as an area that may generally be delineated around species' occurrences. This may include those areas used throughout all or part of the species' life cycle, even if not used on a regular basis (e.g., migratory corridors, seasonal habitats, and habitats used periodically, but not solely by vagrant individuals). The physical or biological features are the features that support the life-history needs of the species, including but not limited to, water characteristics, soil type, geological features, sites, prey, vegetation, symbiotic species, or other features - including critical ephemeral locations like migratory feeding, wintering, or summering grounds. Changing these definitions could have a significant negative impact on habitat conservation.

Critical Area II: Rolling back legal protection for threatened wildlife and plants

Revision of the Regulations for Prohibitions to Threatened Wildlife and Plants. This proposed rule change will reduce legal protection for wildlife and plants listed as threatened.
  • What it says: "We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, propose to revise our regulations extending most of the prohibitions for activities involving endangered species to threatened species. For species already listed as a threatened species, the proposed regulations would not alter the applicable prohibitions. The proposed regulations would require the Service, pursuant to section 4(d) of the Endangered Species Act, to determine what, if any, protective regulations are appropriate for species that the Service in the future determines to be threatened."
  • What it means: "Take protection" was extended to threatened species in 1978. Like endangered species, threatened species can't be harassed, harmed, pursued, hunted, shot, wounded, killed, trapped, captured, or collected. It provides safeguards to species that are in need of support, but allows some activities to be exempted if the Service finds it appropriate. The proposed rule change would remove these protections for species listed as threatened.
  • Why it's important: Section 4(d) provides legal protection and resources to threatened or dwindling species while rewarding collaborative conservation efforts to keep species like the Gunnison Sage Grouse off the endangered species list. Rolling back these protections will allow threatened wildlife and plants to be subject to "take". It will also remove incentives for collaboration, making it more difficult and costly to reverse population declines. The Section 4(d) rule was designed to create fewer endangered species by providing incentives to protect and rebuild threatened species. Rolling it back will cause population declines among wildlife and plants already struggling to hold on, creating more endangered species.
What you can do:  Comment on this change by pressing the blue "Comment now" button at the upper right side of this page:

The devil in the details: The federal government seeks specific feedback about replacing blanket 4(d) protections with special rules for each species listed as threatened. It also seeks feedback regarding a timeframe for finalizing any rules, after which the rule would be dropped and the process restarted before any decision could be made. Replacing blanket protections with special protections and drop rules will significantly reduce protections for threatened species, especially given the dwindling resources allocated to the Fish and Wildlife Service.

Critical Area III: Weakening the role that biological assessment and science play in listing decisions

Revision of Regulations for Interagency Cooperation. This proposed rule change will weaken the role that biological evidence and science play in listing decisions.

  • What it says: "We, FWS and NMFS (collectively referred to as the “Services” or “we”), propose to amend portions of our regulations that implement section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. The Services are proposing these changes to improve and clarify the interagency consultation processes and make them more efficient and consistent."
  • What it means: The Endangered Species Act currently directs all Federal agencies to work to conserve endangered and threatened species and to use their authorities to further the purposes of the Act. The proposed changes to Section 7 weaken the requirement that Federal agencies consult with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service when any action an agency carries out, funds, or authorizes may affect a listed endangered or threatened species.
  • Why it's important: When a Federal agency determines that its action is likely to adversely affect a listed species, the agency submits a request for formal consultation to the Fish and Wildlife Service. Formal consultation includes sharing information about the project and species likely to be affected by the action. Once formal consultation is done, the Service prepares a biological opinion on whether the proposed activity will jeopardize the continued existence of a listed species. The Section 7 Rule mandates consultation and produces listing decisions based on the best available biological science. Rolling it back will reduce the role that science-based evidence plays in making listing decisions and minimize the role of the US Fish and Wildlife Service in conserving America's wildlife and plants for the public good.

What you can do:  Comment on this change by pressing the blue "Comment now" button at the upper right side of this page:

The devil in the details: Note that the federal government is seeking comment on the extent to which the changes outlined in this proposed rule will affect timeframes and resources needed to conduct consultation and (2) anticipated cost savings resulting from the changes. They are also seeking comment on the merit, authority, and means for the Services to conduct a single consultation, resulting in a single biological opinion, for Federal agency actions affecting species that are under the jurisdiction of both FWS and NMFS. FWS has a higher standard.

According to the proposed rule changes, the federal government seeks only to make things more efficient and streamlined. Their concentration on technical definitions, bureaucratic language, and efficient timeframes conceals their true intent - to drastically roll back protections for endangered and threatened animals and plants and the habitat they live, feed, breed in, and move through. If I didn't find it all so appalling, I might be awed by the sheer nefariousness of this death by a thousand cuts. Follow the comment links earlier in this blog to speak up for America's wildlife and wildlands.

Opponents of the Endangered Species Act sometimes argue that the law hasn't been successful, but according to a 2016 report published by The American Bird Conservancy, seventy-eight percent of mainland birds listed as Threatened or Endangered under the ESA have populations that are now stable, increasing, or have recovered enough to be delisted. That sounds an awful lot like success to me.

Why do I care? I had the privilege of visiting Chicago's Field Museum during a peregrine conference five years ago. Attendees were given a behind-the-scenes tour of the museum, including a look at their vast bird collection - lovingly preserved corpses of birds kept for study and remembrance. It was there that I got my only look at the Carolina parakeet and the Ivory-billed woodpecker. Gone forever from life, the two species now exist only as study skins in museums. Had the United States not banned DDT and passed the Endangered Species Act, it is highly likely that peregrine falcons, bald eagles, and many other animals would have joined them, existing only as rumors, museum specimens and curiosities on film. However cherished their memories or lovingly preserved their corpses, they too would be gone, dead, extinct, lost. Forever. I care because I've come to love them, and because I also believe that their survival is our own. This land is our land. We need to care for it and respect it

Monday, April 23, 2018

Questions about N2B: Dad, UME, Mom, and the eaglets

We're getting a lot of questions about the situation in Decorah. What happened to Dad? Will Mom abandon the eaglets? Did the unknown male eagle attack Dad or drive him away? Are the eaglets being fed? Is Mom feeding herself? We put together a timeline and answers to the most asked questions. Keep in mind that, while researchers have studied bald eagles for years, this level of observation became possible only very recently and there is much that we are seeing for the first time.

Timeline of events
  • 4/18/18: A serious snowstorm follows right on the heels of a three-day weekend storm. Mom and Dad spend the day caring for the eaglets, at times feeding and brooding them together in the nest. Dad is last seen on the nest around 7:30 PM. Mom broods overnight. We have been reviewing the footage to look and listen for anything unusual, but the process is time-consuming. We will let everyone know if we do.
  • 4/19/18: A bright, sunny day follows the storm. We are a little concerned when Dad doesn't replace Mom for his morning shift, but think that he might be resting up from the intense flurry of activity following two large storms. As the day wears on without Dad, we become more concerned and begin making plans to go look for him. We see another eagle. Is that Dad? We send an on-the-ground observer, who tells us that Dad is there. However, Dad doesn't show up to feed the eaglets or give Mom a break. 
  • 4/20/18: We enter a second day without Dad. We are increasingly worried that something has gone wrong. Mom continues to care for the eaglets, who are stuffed to the point of bursting with nestovers and fresh-caught fish. However, she clearly knows that Dad is gone and at times seems very wary about activity near the nest. She peal calls throughout the day with no response. Our camera operators catch several glimpses of another eagle in the area. We determine it is a male eagle and designate him UME, or unidentified male eagle. Could that be Dad? If it isn't, why is Mom tolerating him so close to the nest? He spends part of the day perched above it and Mom at one point perches near him. If it is, why isn't he giving Mom a break, bringing in prey, responding to her peal calls, and harassing an osprey that has perched by the pond? Why does she seem so wary of his presence? Unfortunately, UME never comes close enough for a look at his iris, molt pattern, or foot scales. John launches a search of the hatchery and nearby areas with some friends, but doesn't find anything. Despite yesterday's observation, we become increasingly convinced (based on behavior and photographs) that Dad isn't here. After a consultation with our eagle experts, we announce that UME is not Dad.
  • 4/21/18: John coordinates a search from the hatchery. 20 volunteers and a drone team from the Decorah Fire Department look for Dad. They search roadways around the hatchery, the bike trail, the stream, the area around N1, the hatchery grounds, hatchery buildings, and power poles and lines to the east. We don't find any sign of Dad. Meanwhile, Mom continues to feed the eaglets and we see UME fly on to the Skywalk and stay for about five minutes. Mom is agitated by the intrusion and remains wary of UME, although her peal calling has largely stopped. 
  • 4/22/18: Dad is still absent, another search doesn't turn up anything, and Mom is still wary of UME (who is still hanging around and does a fly through at one point). She feeds the eaglets throughout the day. While we worry, they have bulging crops and are developing on track: eating, sleeping, pooping, bonking, playing house, wingercizing, exploring their clown-clomping feet, and starting to grow pinfeathers. 
Your questions
  • QQ: Could UME have driven Dad away? Or did Dad leave because he was tired of caring or could no longer care for the eaglets after two big storms?
    We talked with our eagle experts about the likelihood of both questions. It isn't unknown for new eagles to drive away territorial eagles, although we haven't seen displacement during the nesting season at any of our nests. We don't have any documentation of an adult eagle, male or female, simply deserting young, and Dad was caring for the eaglets up until the time he disappeared. Put simply, we don't believe that Dad voluntarily deserted the nest but we don't know where he is or whether UME had anything to do with his disappearance. After several days of terrible migration weather, birds finally got a break and were busy heading north. UME could have displaced Dad, or he may have been migrating through the area when Dad disappeared. Since there was no response to his tentative exploration of the area around the nest, he might have decided to stay and get a little closer. 
  • QQ: What could have happened to Dad? 
    Our search was structured along the following possibilities: UME injured Dad in a fight (we searched around the nest with binoculars and checked the trail, stream, fields, and area around N1). Dad was hit by a car while eating or getting roadkill (we searched roadways and ditches). Dad was electrocuted on or collided with a powerline (we searched the base of poles and along powerlines). Dad got caught in a building (we searched hatchery buildings). We covered a lot of area with 20 volunteers and a Decorah Fire Department drone, but didn't find Dad. We still don't know what happened to him. 
  • QQ: Is UME a threat to the eaglets?
    This is a tough question. Anecdotes and scientific literature both contain examples of new adults killing eaglets and caring for eaglets. We are hopeful that he won't, given that he hasn't behaved in an aggressive way towards the eaglets or Mom. We're waiting to see if he brings Mom any food or courts her. 
  • QQ: Are you going to pull the eaglets from the nest? 
    We are not.  From a human perspective, we would be caring for the eaglets by keeping them safe from hunger and predators. But from Mom's perspective, we would be invading and killing her eaglets. Mom is far more capable of caring for her eaglets than we are, and we have no plans to take her young from her.  
  • QQ: So Mom can feed the eaglets by herself? 
    Mom has fed the eaglets to bursting multiple times every day since Dad disappeared. Between the hatchery and the stream, she is more than capable of keeping them fed. 
  • QQ: I saw that Mom was attacked by a bird. Was that an eagle? 
    Mom was being swooped by crows earlier today. We've also seen starlings and nuthatches steal nesting material and search for food. All of this is completely normal behavior and has nothing to do with Dad being gone. 
  • QQ: Mom seems really wary and watchful. Why?
    Mom is probably responding to UME, who as of this post on April 23rd was still in the area. While he hasn't treated her aggressively, he still isn't her mate and she is usually very wary when he comes near the nest. We've only seen one exception, which happened on Friday, April 20, when she perched near him.
  • QQ: Could this be Mom and Dad's offspring from another year? 
    While it could be, we have no way of knowing one way or another.
  • QQ: How old was Dad?
    We don't know, but believe him to be at least 21 years old based on his plumage and when we first started watching him.. Is it possible that he could have been less cold-tolerant because of age? We're asking our team on that, but we don't know at this point. 
Thank you for all of your care and kind comments. We know this is hard on everyone. We promise to keep you all posted.